Which logical informal fallacy is committed in the following argument: 'Mr. X…
2022
Which logical informal fallacy is committed in the following argument: 'Mr. X used abusive language toward the child who threw a stone at his car. Since child abuse is a crime, he should be reported to the authorities'?
Answer: C. Equivocation — ConceptEquivocation occurs when a key word or phrase changes meaning between premises, making an inference appear valid even though the meanings differ. It is…
- A.
Appeal to Emotion
- B.
Hasty generalisation
- C.
Equivocation
- D.
Appeal to force
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Concept
Equivocation occurs when a key word or phrase changes meaning between premises, making an inference appear valid even though the meanings differ. It is a defect in the use of language rather than evidence for the conclusion.
Application
In the statement about abusive language, “abusive language” means insulting or offensive speech directed at a child. In “child abuse is a crime,” “child abuse” means harmful mistreatment of a child. The argument shifts the sense of “abuse” while treating it as unchanged, so the conclusion does not follow from the premise. The fallacy is Equivocation.
Contrast and cross-check
Appeal to Emotion relies on feelings such as pity, fear, or anger as support.
Hasty generalisation draws a broad rule from too few or unrepresentative cases.
Appeal to force uses a threat or coercion as support.
The repeated expression changes meaning, which cross-checks the classification as Equivocation.